May 312012
 

Adam Selzer (sigh, he’s so adorable. Check out Sparks if you haven’t already.) posted this over at his blog:  YA stuff to avoid from now on. His list is awesome and spot on. I am going to add to it.

11. He didn’t add “no romantic interests who act like rapists,” but I’m going to. I’m also going to stop reading books that have these sorts of boys in them. Urk.

12. No more average girls being chased around by 3, 4, even 5 different boys like it’s mating season. This doesn’t happen in real life, nor do we want it to. It’s awkward and weird and reeks of an author’s narcissistic fantasies starring a weird idealized author-self.

13. No more clumsy girls. I get it’s just another way for the girl to need the male lead to catch her sometimes because not only can she not take care of herself, she can’t even walk straight. It’s kind of offensive and stopped being cute ages ago.

Passivity is so last year. (http://www.flickr.com/photos/11781862@N06/4551322068)

14. Violently passive girls. Girls who walk into the open arms of a blood thirsty killer because they are kind of hot. Girls who willingly go to the docks at midnight to meet a bad guy and yet still make mention in her head that it’s a really bad idea. Girls who don’t listen to their gut because they aren’t good at saying no. Girls who meet someone online and go on a date without telling anyone who or where she’s going. Girls who walk around the warehouse district alone at night because she’s too nervous to ask for a ride from the cute boy.

15. Being reminded of some character trait every couple of pages. His marble, God-like body. His cold skin. Her biting her bottom lip. His hotness. Her clumsiness. Her averageness. Her messy hair. His messy hair. His lopsided grin. His adonis-like body. His bronze skin. Her untamable red hair. We get it. Save the word count for plot twists.

16. GIRLS IN DRESSES ON COVERS FOR NO GOOD REASON.

17. Dead girls on covers for no good reason. (Carrie Ryan gets a pass on this. She writes about zombies. Fair is fair.)

18. Abusive, condescending boys who don’t shape up, but the violently passive girl takes it anyway. See number 11 and 14.

19. Girls who can’t do anything for themselves. Anything.

20. Setting up characters and situations where the phrase, “You have no regard for your own safety/life,” is used as an accusation against the female lead character. Especially when this leads to the male character taking over her life and decisions because she can’t be trusted to make any decisions for herself.

21. She really can’t make any decisions for herself. Give her some roller skates and she heads for the nearest cliff.

 

Ok, clearly I have some issues to work out with my genre.

Did I miss any? Let me know in the comments and stop over at Adam’s blog and say hi! His blog is excellent.

May 302012
 

Oh my god it’s so bad someone make the pain stop. Put out my eyes! Put out my eyes!

“The show is Sherlock Holmes in Manhattan in America modern day.”

And the writing? Oh it’s so bad.

Joan Watson: “Your father told me, he said you were a detective?”

Sherlock Holmes: “I was a consultant for Scotland Yard. I wasn’t paid for my services so I answer to no one but myself.”

Joan Watson: “My name is Joan Watson. I’ve been hired by your father to be your sober companion. I’m here to make your transition from your rehab to the routine of your everyday life as smooth as possible.”

Based on the trailer they plan to exposition every detail to us like we are gibbering monkies.

And you all know I’m all for the great woman’s uprising, but I’ve got to tell you I’m really unhappy with making John Watson a chick. There are some things you shouldn’t mess with. Thor must have a hammer. Dracula must be a vampire. Watson must be a dude sidekick to Holmes. Not his romantic tension sober companion. Why don’t you just stab me in the heart already.

Next thing you know they’ll be making a drama called “Down River” starring Taylor Kitsch as a slightly more grown up Huck Finn with a drug habit and an eye for investigating unexplained occurrences with his partner, Detective Margot James, played by Zoe Saldana, who, despite ruining her reputation, can’t seem to turn her back on the young Huck. Huck’s childhood friend and rival, Tom Sawyer, played by Benjamin Stone, is a reoccuring villain until the second season when a new villain, a CEO of a corporation dumping toxins into the local water system (played by Mark Sheppard, ‘natch), rises up and the two boyhood rivals have to join forces. They will also battle for Detective James’s affections, which Tom will win for the duration of the third season and then Huck will win back in the season finale with a kiss to end all kisses.

OMG NBC, if you’re listening, please don’t make this. I was just joking. Please. Please.

 

 

 

 

May 292012
 

This is sort of how we feel when we talk about race - like big goofy socially awkward octopuses. (http://www.flickr.com/photos/35237098983@N01/131810048)

Last week I wrote a short post with a call to action for everyone to continue talking about race because that’s the only way we’re going to stop feeling weird about talking about race.

The comments floored me. There are only a few, but they totally emphasize the very base of the problem. Our lack of ability to talk about race in any meaningful way.

Let me take you back to the 90s to a 15 year old Sommer. I grew up in what everyone fondly referred to as our “ghetto.” I didn’t really understand that term even though I grew up in the area. I knew most people in my neighborhood were poor, like us. I knew that most of my classmates were not white, but I never actively sat around thinking, “Wow, all of my classmates are black. Isn’t that interesting?” I had black friends, but I had mostly white friends.

So, 15 year old me. I’m sitting at lunch watching a group of black girls at a table near mine. They were very loud and extremely verbose. They seemed thrilled about everything. One of the girls opened her jacket and said, “Check it out! They are finally coming in!” (Hint: She was talking about her boobs.) All her girlfriends applauded and congratulated her.

I, on the other hand, was wearing a sports bra a size too small to make mine disappear. My mom was riding me hard those days that I was getting bigger in that area and that I needed to watch what I was eating and maybe I shouldn’t be in so many sports because it was making me look stocky. I would never have shown off my curvy body to my girlfriends and even if I had, they would have given me looks of sympathy, not high-fives. What I really wanted to do was stop that girl in the hallway and ask her what made it ok for her to have her body but wrong for me to have mine even though they were pretty similar. I had no idea how significant this question actually was, I just knew that I had boobs and was told to get rid of them immediately, and she was made gorgeous by hers.

So why was it so hard for me to talk to this girl? Why couldn’t I sit down and have an honest discussion and learn if there even was a difference with how we were raised that gave this black girl permission to love her boobs, but I was supposed to be ashamed of mine? Did her mom support her? Was it a cultural thing or just two individuals with very different parents? Does it mean something that most of the white models I saw in magazines had the bodies of a 12 year old and the black models looked more like women? Why couldn’t I find the language to have this conversation back then?

And I think that’s the key. We don’t have the language needed to bridge the subject. We’re taught that there’s something negative about drawing attention to the color of a non-white person’s skin like this is something we’re supposed to pretend isn’t real. (Funny enough, we do the same thing to fat girls.) I remember having anxiety over whether I was supposed to refer to someone as “black” or “African American.” If I chose wrong, would that make me racist? Did wondering these things make me racist?!?!?! Would that make me a bad person? Would they hate me and be offended by me?

The color of our skin should not be something we wring our hands over. And yet if we can’t even find the appropriate words to articulate our differences and similarities, how will we ever get down to the task of actually talking about them?

There’s a confusion about being diverse in our novels and a knee jerk reaction to force diversity for the sake of being fair. That’s not what the discussion should be about. Stories have characters and there are no guidelines saying 20% of your characters need to be something other than white. It’s just we need to not revert to our starting position and make a character white just because that’s our baseline. There are lots of different types of people, colors and ethnicities and sexual orientations aside. The world is a diverse place and we do our books a disservice by not exploring these possibilities.

For example, off the top of your head, how many books can you name where the white average (but pretty) main female character of a book dreams of being a writer and frequently has either a Salinger or Austen or Bronte  tucked under her arm at some point in the story? Have you ever wondered why there are so many of these female characters flitting about our YA lit? Could it be because this was the teenage life so many authors had? It’s our baseline. We need to challenge ourselves to dream beyond what we already love.

There’s nothing wrong with picking up a book and imagining the main character looks just like us, even if they aren’t. This is not racism, it’s escapism. It doesn’t matter what color hair or eye or skin you pick as the author, the reader generally makes the main character a better version of themselves. I think authors sort of do the same thing. But stopping for a second and exploring the possibilities of a character can offer a complexity to a story you didn’t even know existed. You don’t have to talk race issues in your story just because one of your main characters isn’t white. That’s only their skin color. It’s who they are and what they add to the story that matters. But that’s true no matter what color, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or gender they happen to be.

In summary:

  • Step away from your baseline, whatever that might be, and open yourself up to all the possibilities that exist in the world.
  • It’s ok to ask questions, even if you don’t know what the right language is. Starting the conversation is the most important part.
  • If someone asks you a question and they are nervous and don’t have the right language, be patient and talk to them. We’re going to sound stupid and flounder about like social octopuses for a while, but in time we’ll get the hang of it.
  • Talk to people on your blog. Ask questions in Twitter. It’s ok to be nervous, we’ve got a lot of years of people telling us not to talk about race to fight through. This is not something that’s going to change overnight, but we have to start somewhere. It’s ok to be a social octopus!!!
  • KEEP TALKING. Keep talking. Keep talking. Don’t be afraid. We are all in this together. And also? Have you ever known anyone to ever NOT want to talk about their life and experiences? We’re bloggers. Talking about ourselves is in our blood. I guarantee you ask one question and the first hand accounts of growing up <fill in the blank> will come pouring in.

 

Do you have any questions you’d like to ask but were afraid to? Be gracious, and ask away. We’ll see what we can do about getting them answered.

 

May 282012
 

 

Manuscripts and letters from our favourite literary (and occasionally historical) figures.

http://fuckyeahmanuscripts.tumblr.com/

 

It is never to early in your career to start a handwritten journal that will be poured over years after your death so that everyone will know just how crazy you actually were.

 

*love*

 

 

May 282012
 

Have you guys checked out The Intergalactic Academy blog? It’s not often that I get to promote MG stuff, but this awesome blog teams MG up with YA and gets down and dirty with sci-fi in both worlds. There are a lot of great reviews but also some cool posts like: The Worldbuilding Files: An Argument For Extra-Terrestrial SFDefining Genre: The Problem with “Dystopian Romance”, and Defining Genre: Dystopian and Post-Apocalyptic.

The above mentioned post, by the way, Defining Genre: The Problem with “Dystopian Romance”, is maybe one of the best written posts on the subject I have ever had the privilege to read. I’ve talked about it here before, and my views haven’t changed. I do this little ranting and raving jumping around in my living room dance every time I get about a 1/3 of a way into a sci-fi/dystopian that is clearly a romance set in a backdrop of something sort of sci-fi/dystopian-like for atmosphere for the romance, and not for the, you know, PLOT. I won’t divulge how many dystopian labeled YA I’ve read in the last year and a half that I’ve stopped reading as soon as I realized the setting was going to be completely underdeveloped and misrepresented. Anyway, the post also starts out with maybe the best quote on the subject I’ve ever read by fantasy writer Jay Kristoff:

Calling your book a dystopian when it’s actually just a romance with dirty windows is kinda like lying.

 

 

May 232012
 

I want to share this with everyone because I think it’s one of those things that should be embraced and talked about at length.

We have a lot of problems in this world – seeing other human beings who are different than us as somehow less human is a big ugly one. Whether we’re talking about race or gender, religious choices or sexual choices, we have a major problem with accepting people for who they are.

When Hunger Games went up and Cinna and Rue were cast as being black, a lot of discussion happened because of it. Good discussion, bad discussion, maybe some surprising insights for some people into how they view the world.

Now it looks like Finnick may be cast with a black actor and all the same confusion and disbelief and discussion is building again. It’s not an easy topic for a lot of people to talk about – but I am a big believer that talking about it is the only way to take its ugly power away. We are a beautiful crayola box world and I long for a world where you are who you are and there aren’t restrictions on caring about things based on color, sex, gender, body type, or ethnicity.

We should be able to turn to someone who is not like ourselves and say, hey, I have questions. Is it ok if I sound stupid for a minute and just ask them? I don’t have any black friends and I’m confused about some things. I don’t know any one who is Asian, who can I talk to if I don’t understand something? I need to know more about girls. Boys seem really weird to me, why do they act like this? I think we need to get to a point in the world where we can do this. Just talk.

I also hope more authors keep talking about this topic – about writing characters not like us and reading about characters not like us and how a book with a black character doesn’t have to be a story about a character not being white. I think it’s the dialogue that will get us to a new place in our society. Not talking about it is why we have to have a Tumblr called HungerGameTweets specifically designed to highlight the non-discussion we haven’t had so we can start having the ones that need to happen now.

And clearly this topic is too big for one post, so I hope to revisit it again and again and again. Until we don’t need to anymore.

Tips on Writing Race from a Teen Writer

Kate Hart dissects the 2011 YA covers with gender and race in mind

The problem isn’t just covers

Why The Pretty White Girl YA Book Cover Trend Needs to End

The Ongoing Problem of Race in Y.A.

A Complete Guide to ‘Hipster Racism’

The Whitewashing of YA Literature

Straight White Male: The Lowest Difficulty Setting There Is

Queer Women and (In)visibility

All the White Girls

Cover Your Dreams in More Dreams

Race in YA Lit: Wake Up & Smell the Coffee-Colored Skin, White Authors!

Avoiding LGBTQ Stereotypes in YA Fiction, Part 1: Major LGBTQ Stereotypes

I have numbers! Stats on LGBT Young Adult Books Published in the U.S. – Updated 9/15/11

Supporting character whitewashed in film adaptation of “Warm Bodies”

Talking to Teens Who Tweeted Racist Things About The Hunger Games

 

May 222012
 

Recently I was geeking out over The Avengers movie (OMG, SO FREAKING GOOD I AM IN LOVE WITH THE HULK THIS IS SOMETHING THAT HAS NEVER HAPPENED TO ME BEFORE. Ahem.) and I stumbled across the movie poster online.

See left.

And I started ranting and raving (like I do) about how the only chick in the movie has to be seen butt first on the poster. If you believe the lies that movie posters tell us, you’d think all girls walked into rooms butt first, and stood butt first into crowds, speaking provocatively over our shoulder. So abnormal and creeptastic. I started thinking, am I the only one who feels these things? Am I the only one who is tired of seeing the single token female being reduced to the over the shoulder smoldering glance while our ass greets the masses like our own personal social resume? Urk.

Thank you interwebs for not making me feel alone with my craziness! As it turns out, this is a thing, being offended by the butt first posturing of lady heroes.

Huffington Post: Kevin Bolk’s Bootylicious ‘Avengers’ Movie Poster Takes On Superhero Sexism

TOR.com: Hey, Everyone — Stop Taking This Picture! (No, I Mean It.)

whedonesque.com: http://whedonesque.com/comments/27677 (in response to Kevin Bolk’s art)

Oh interwebs. You are my tribe.

 

May 212012
 

China Miéville is a brilliant sci-fi writer. He’s got a poet in his pen – there’s just something about the way he strings words together that is just so much more wordlier than the rest of us mere mortals. (I made that word up. I’m a writer. I can do that.)

Whenever I get into a discussion with another writer about why prologues, in general, suck and should be avoided, I always say: unless you are China Miéville. I don’t know how he does it, but the unnumbered chapter before chapter 1 are always so damn awesome I can only just shrug and say, well, there are exceptions. You’re probably not China, though, so stick to what works.

Don’t believe me? Check out the prologue to Perdido Street Station. SO AMAZING. The way he writes just kills me. Like being spoon fed white chocolate ice cream. Yum.

The river twists and turns to face the city. It looms suddenly, massive, stamped on the landscape. Its light wells up around the surrounds, the rock hills, like bruise blood. Its dirty towers glow. I am debased. I am compelled to worship this extraordinary presence that has silted into existence at the conjunction of two rivers. It is a vast pollutant, a stench, a klaxon sounding. Fat chimneys retch dirt into the sky even now in the deep night. It is not the current which pulls us but the city itself, its weight sucks us in. Faint shouts, here and there the calls of beasts, the obscene clash and pounding from the factories as huge machines rut. Railways trace urban anatomy like protruding veins. Red brick and dark walls, squat churches like troglodytic things, ragged awnings flickering, cobbled mazes in the old town, culs-de-sac, sewers riddling the earth like secular sepulchers, a new landscape of wasteground, crushed stone, libraries fat with forgotten volumes, old hospitals, tower blocks, ships and metal claws that lift cargoes from the water.

How could we not see this approaching? What trick of topography is this, that lets the sprawling monster hide behind corners to leap out at the traveler?

It is too late to flee.

OK but here’s the thing. China’s work? It’s really, really weird.

You know how there are those stories you read that are so freaking amazing you want everyone you know to read them too, so you try to describe them but the more you try the more you sound like a lunatic? (I’m talking to you, Warm Bodies.) ALL OF HIS BOOKS WILL MAKE YOU SOUND LIKE A LUNATIC.

Example 1 Kraken:

In the Darwin Centre at London’s Natural History Museum, Billy Harrow, a cephalopod specialist, is conducting a tour whose climax is meant to be the Centre’s prize specimen of a rare Architeuthis duxbetter known as the Giant Squid. But Billy’s tour takes an unexpected turn when the squid suddenly and impossibly vanishes into thin air.

As Billy soon discovers, this is the precipitating act in a struggle to the death between mysterious but powerful forces in a London whose existence he has been blissfully ignorant of until now, a city whose denizens—human and otherwise—are adept in magic and murder.

There is the Congregation of God Kraken, a sect of squid worshippers whose roots go back to the dawn of humanity—and beyond. There is the criminal mastermind known as the Tattoo, a merciless maniac inked onto the flesh of a hapless victim. There is the FSRC—the Fundamentalist and Sect-Related Crime Unit—a branch of London’s finest that fights sorcery

with sorcery. There is Wati, a spirit from ancient Egypt who leads a ragtag union of magical familiars. There are the Londonmancers, who read the future in the city’s entrails. There is Grisamentum, London’s greatest wizard, whose shadow lingers long after his death. And then there is Goss and Subby, an ageless old man and a cretinous boy who, together, constitute a terrifying—yet darkly charismatic—demonic duo.

All of them—and others—are in pursuit of Billy, who inadvertently holds the key to the missing squid, an embryonic god whose powers, properly harnessed, can destroy all that is, was, and ever shall be.

Example 2, Un Lun Dun:

What is Un Lun Dun?

It is London through the looking glass, an urban Wonderland of strange delights where all the lost and broken things of London end up . . . and some of its lost and broken people, too–including Brokkenbroll, boss of the broken umbrellas; Obaday Fing, a tailor whose head is an enormous pin-cushion, and an empty milk carton called Curdle. Un Lun Dun is a place where words are alive, a jungle lurks behind the door of an ordinary house, carnivorous giraffes stalk the streets, and a dark cloud dreams of burning the world. It is a city awaiting its hero, whose coming was prophesied long ago, set down for all time in the pages of a talking book.

When twelve-year-old Zanna and her friend Deeba find a secret entrance leading out of London and into this strange city, it seems that the ancient prophecy is coming true at last. But then things begin to go shockingly wrong.

Example 3, The City & The City:

When a murdered woman is found in the city of Beszel, somewhere at the edge of Europe, it looks to be a routine case for Inspector Tyador Borlú of the Extreme Crime Squad. To investigate, Borlú must travel from the decaying Beszel to its equal, rival, and intimate neighbor, the vibrant city of Ul Qoma. But this is a border crossing like no other, a journey as psychic as it is physical, a seeing of the unseen. With Ul Qoman detective Qussim Dhatt, Borlú is enmeshed in a sordid underworld of nationalists intent on destroying their neighboring city, and unificationists who dream of dissolving the two into one. As the detectives uncover the dead woman’s secrets, they begin to suspect a truth that could cost them more than their lives. What stands against them are murderous powers in Beszel and in Ul Qoma: and, most terrifying of all, that which lies between these two cities.

This week, the web comic Penny Arcade made a dig at China’s latest book, Railsea, because of it’s total and absolute weirdness. It’s funny if you’re a fan of China (which you have no reason not to be!) Check it out here: http://penny-arcade.com/comic/2012/05/14

Railsea is hands down the most ridiculous sounding of all his books. I’m sure it’s brilliant. He’s the only one who can get away with being weird and brilliant. The rest of us would be burned alive by our critique groups. I love the cover though.

On board the moletrain Medes, Sham Yes ap Soorap watches in awe as he witnesses his first moldywarpe hunt: the giant mole bursting from the earth, the harpoonists targeting their prey, the battle resulting in one’s death and the other’s glory. But no matter how spectacular it is, Sham can’t shake the sense that there is more to life than traveling the endless rails of the railsea–even if his captain can think only of the hunt for the ivory-coloured mole she’s been chasing since it took her arm all those years ago. When they come across a wrecked train, at first it’s a welcome distraction. But what Sham finds in the derelict—a series of pictures hinting at something, somewhere, that should be impossible—leads to considerably more than he’d bargained for. Soon he’s hunted on all sides, by pirates, trainsfolk, monsters and salvage-scrabblers. And it might not be just Sham’s life that’s about to change. It could be the whole of the railsea.

 

(When I read this to my husband, he said “it sounds like Moby Dick. But with trains. And moles.”)

 

 

May 172012
 

I’m not ready to talk about how the death of Maurice Sendak has effected me. Badly, is the best I can say. I spent most of that day running to the girl’s room to cry my eyes out. Everyone thought someone in my family had died, and those few who dragged the truth out of me were totally weirded out over my reaction to an author’s death. So I’m feeling a little jaded and also still very heartsore.

I will talk about it because Maurice Sendak means a lot to me. I just don’t want to talk about it yet.

Instead I’d like to share this site with you. It’s called Terrible Yellow Eyes.

Terrible Yellow Eyes is a collection of works inspired by the beloved classic, Where the Wild Things Are by Maurice Sendak.

The contributing artists share a love and admiration for Sendak’s work and the pieces presented here were done as a tribute to his life and legacy.

Some Examples: